Advertisement

Avelumab Maintenance Treatment After First-line Chemotherapy in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma–A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

Published:October 08, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2022.10.001

      Abstract

      Background

      Recently, a clinical trial (NCT02603432) showed that avelumab maintenance treatment, post first-line chemotherapy, can significantly prolong the overall survival of patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC), however, the treatment was very expensive. This study aimed to determine the cost-effectiveness of avelumab maintenance therapy in advanced or metastatic UC from the US taxpayer perspective.

      Methods

      Based on the data of the JAVELIN Bladder 100 clinical trial (NCT 02603432), a Markov multi-state model was constructed to investigate the costs and clinical outcomes of avelumab maintenance after platinum-based chemotherapy versus best supportive care (BSC) for advanced or metastatic UC. Parameters of the model came from the 2020 Average Sales Price Drug Pricing Files and published literature. The main outputs were costs, life years (LYs), quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Robustness was tested by deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. The analysis was stratified to include both the overall population and a subset of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive patients.

      Results

      Avelumab maintenance therapy was estimated to generate an additional 0.26 QALYs (1.46 vs. 1.20 QALYs) and costs $183,271 ($278,323 vs. $95,052) more compared to BSC alone in the overall population, yielding an ICER of $699,065/QALY. For the PD-L1-positive population, avelumab produced a 0.42 increase in QALYs (1.74 vs. 1.32 QALYs) and raised costs to $223,238 ($320,355 vs. $97,117), resulting in an ICER of $521,850/QALY for this population. Both ICERs were above the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $200,000/QALY. Sensitivity analyses manifested that the model was robust.

      Conclusion

      From the perspective of the US taxpayer, avelumab maintenance therapy is considered cost-ineffective for patients with advanced or metastatic UC at a WTP threshold of $200,000/QALY in the overall population as well as in PD-L1-positive population.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Genitourinary Cancer
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Hepp Z
        • Shah SN
        • Smoyer K
        • Vadagam P.
        Epidemiology and treatment patterns for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a systematic literature review and gap analysis.
        J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021; 27: 240-255https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2020.20285
        • Witjes JA
        • Bruins HM
        • Cathomas R
        • et al.
        European Association of Urology Guidelines on Muscle-invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer: Summary of the 2020 Guidelines.
        Eur Urol. 2021; 79: 82-104https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2020.03.055
        • Richters A
        • Aben KKH
        • Kiemeney L.
        The global burden of urinary bladder cancer: an update.
        World J Urol. 2020; 38: 1895-1904https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02984-4
      1. Ferlay J EM, Lam F, et al. Cancer today: data visualization tools for exploring the global cancer burden 2020 [Available at: https://gco.iarc.fr/today ] Accessed 2021 February 24.

        • Barqawi Y
        • Borrego M
        • Roberts M
        • Abraham I.
        Cost-effectiveness model of abiraterone plus prednisone, cabazitaxel plus prednisone and enzalutamide for visceral metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer therapy after docetaxel therapy resistance.
        J Med Econ. 2019; 22: 1202-1209https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2019.1661581
        • Flaig TW
        • Spiess PE
        • Agarwal N
        • et al.
        Bladder Cancer, Version 3.2020, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.
        J Natl Compr Cancer Netw: JNCCN. 2020; 18: 329-354https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2020.0011
        • Bukhari N
        • Al-Shamsi HO
        • Azam F.
        Update on the Treatment of Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma.
        Sci World J. 2018; 20185682078https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5682078
        • Bellmunt J
        • von der Maase H
        • Mead GM
        • et al.
        Randomized phase III study comparing paclitaxel/cisplatin/gemcitabine and gemcitabine/cisplatin in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer without prior systemic therapy: EORTC Intergroup Study 30987.
        J Clin Oncol: J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2012; 30: 1107-1113https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2011.38.6979
        • Novakovic AM
        • Wilkins JJ
        • Dai H
        • et al.
        Changing Body Weight-Based Dosing to a Flat Dose for Avelumab in Metastatic Merkel Cell and Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma.
        Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2020; 107: 588-596https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.1645
        • Patel MR
        • Ellerton J
        • Infante JR
        • et al.
        Avelumab in metastatic urothelial carcinoma after platinum failure (JAVELIN Solid Tumor): pooled results from two expansion cohorts of an open-label, phase 1 trial.
        Lancet Oncol. 2018; 19: 51-64https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30900-2
        • Kim TJ
        • Cho KS
        • Koo KC.
        Current Status and Future Perspectives of Immunotherapy for Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: A Comprehensive Review.
        Cancers. 2020; 12https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12010192
        • Stenehjem DD
        • Tran D
        • Nkrumah MA
        • Gupta S.
        PD1/PDL1 inhibitors for the treatment of advanced urothelial bladder cancer.
        OncoTargets Ther. 2018; 11: 5973-5989https://doi.org/10.2147/ott.S135157
        • Apolo AB
        • Ellerton JA
        • Infante JR
        • et al.
        Avelumab as second-line therapy for metastatic, platinum-treated urothelial carcinoma in the phase Ib JAVELIN Solid Tumor study: 2-year updated efficacy and safety analysis.
        J Immunother Cancer. 2020; 8https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2020-001246
        • Shay R
        • Nicklawsky A
        • Gao D
        • Lam ET.
        A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Versus Pembrolizumab Plus Axitinib and Versus Avelumab Plus Axitinib in First-Line Treatment of Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.
        Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2021; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2021.01.009
        • Powles T
        • Park SH
        • Voog E
        • et al.
        Avelumab Maintenance Therapy for Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma.
        N Engl J Med. 2020; 383: 1218-1230https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2002788
        • Loriot Y
        • Necchi A
        • Park S
        • et al.
        Erdafitinib in Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma.
        N Engl J Med. 2019; 381: 338-348https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1817323
        • Knowles M
        • Hurst C.
        Molecular biology of bladder cancer: new insights into pathogenesis and clinical diversity.
        Nat Rev Cancer. 2015; 15: 25-41https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc3817
        • Tai TA
        • Latimer NR
        • Benedict Á
        • Kiss Z
        • Nikolaou A.
        Prevalence of Immature Survival Data for Anti-Cancer Drugs Presented to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence and Impact on Decision Making.
        Value Health: J Int Soc Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2021; 24: 505-512https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2020.10.016
        • Guyot P
        • Ades AE
        • Ouwens MJ
        • Welton NJ.
        Enhanced secondary analysis of survival data: reconstructing the data from published Kaplan-Meier survival curves.
        BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012; 12: 9https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-9
        • Hoyle MW
        • Henley W.
        Improved curve fits to summary survival data: application to economic evaluation of health technologies.
        BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011; 11: 139https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-139
        • Jackson CH
        Flexsurv: A Platform for Parametric Survival Modeling in R.
        J Stat Softw. 2016; 70https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v070.i08
      2. Data visualization tools for exploring the global cancer burden 2020 [Available at: https://gco.iarc.fr/today/ ] Accessed 2021 May 20.

        • Huang M
        • Lou Y
        • Pellissier J
        • et al.
        Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab versus docetaxel for the treatment of previously treated PD-L1 positive advanced NSCLC patients in the United States.
        J Med Econ. 2017; 20: 140-150https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2016.1230123
      3. 2020 ASP Drug Pricing Files. [Available at: https://www.cms.gov/medicare/medicare-part-b-drug-average-sales-price/2020-asp-drug-pricing-files.] Accessed 2021 May 20.

        • Wan X
        • Luo X
        • Tan C
        • Zeng X
        • Zhang Y
        • Peng L.
        First-line atezolizumab in addition to bevacizumab plus chemotherapy for metastatic, nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer: A United States-based cost-effectiveness analysis.
        Cancer. 2019; 125: 3526-3534https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.32368
        • Insinga RP
        • Vanness DJ
        • Feliciano JL
        • Vandormael K
        • Traore S
        • Burke T.
        Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy in the 1st line treatment of non-squamous NSCLC in the US.
        J Med Econ. 2018; 21: 1191-1205https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2018.1521416
        • Nazha S
        • Tanguay S
        • Kapoor A
        • et al.
        Cost-utility of Sunitinib Versus Pazopanib in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma in Canada using Real-world Evidence.
        Clin Drug Investig. 2018; 38: 1155-1165https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-018-0705-6
        • Hale O
        • Patterson K
        • Lai Y
        • et al.
        Cost-effectiveness of Pembrolizumab versus Carboplatin-based Chemotherapy as First-line Treatment of PD-L1-positive Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Ineligible for Cisplatin-based Therapy in the United States.
        Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2021; 19: e17-e30https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2020.07.006
        • Neumann PJ
        • Cohen JT
        • Weinstein MC.
        Updating cost-effectiveness–the curious resilience of the $50,000-per-QALY threshold.
        N Engl J Med. 2014; 371: 796-797https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1405158
        • Criss SD
        • Weaver DT
        • Sheehan DF
        • Lee RJ
        • Pandharipande PV
        • Kong CY.
        Effect of PD-L1 testing on the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of pembrolizumab for advanced urothelial carcinoma of the bladder in the United States.
        Urol Oncol. 2019; 37: 180.e11-180.e18https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.11.016
        • Grimm SE
        • Armstrong N
        • Ramaekers BLT
        • et al.
        Nivolumab for Treating Metastatic or Unresectable Urothelial Cancer: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal.
        PharmacoEconomics. 2019; 37: 655-667https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-018-0723-5
        • Huang X
        • Weng X
        • Lin S
        • et al.
        Half-dose fulvestrant plus anastrozole as a first-line treatment for hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
        BMJ Open. 2020; 10e036107https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036107
        • Rognoni C
        • Tarricone R.
        Healthcare resource consumption for intermittent urinary catheterization: cost-effectiveness of hydrophilic catheters and budget impact analyses.
        BMJ Open. 2017; 7e012360https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012360
        • Clarke G
        • Johnston S
        • Corrie P
        • Kuhn I
        • Barclay S
        Withdrawal of anticancer therapy in advanced disease: a systematic literature review.
        BMC Cancer. 2015; 15: 892https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1862-0
        • Gupta S
        • Nag S
        • Aggarwal S
        • Rauthan A
        • Warrier N.
        Maintenance therapy for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: current therapies and future perspectives - a review.
        J Ovarian Res. 2019; 12: 103https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-019-0579-0
        • Ma H
        • Wu X
        • Tao M
        • et al.
        Efficacy and safety of bevacizumab-based maintenance therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis.
        Medicine. 2019; 98: e18227https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000018227
      4. Yao Y, Deng R, Liao D, et al. Maintenance treatment in advanced HER2-negative gastric cancer. Clinical & translational oncology: official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico. 2020;22:2206-12,doi: 10.1007/s12094-020-02379-7.

      5. Bensimon AG, Zhong Y, Swami U, et al. Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab with axitinib as first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma. Current medical research and opinion. 2020;36:1507-17, doi: 10.1080/03007995.2020.1799771.

        • Lu P
        • Liang W
        • Li J
        • et al.
        A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: First-Line Avelumab Plus Axitinib Versus Sunitinib for Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma.
        Front Pharmacol. 2020; 11: 619https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.00619
        • Grivas P
        • Monk BJ
        • Petrylak D
        • et al.
        Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors as Switch or Continuation Maintenance Therapy in Solid Tumors: Rationale and Current State.
        Target Oncol. 2019; 14: 505-525https://doi.org/10.1007/s11523-019-00665-1
      6. Medication Guides: Food and drug administration (fda); [Available at: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/index.cfm?event=medguide.page ] Accessed 2022 January 5.