Advertisement
Original Study| Volume 21, ISSUE 1, P55-62, February 2023

Download started.

Ok

Cabozantinib Safety With Different Anticoagulants in Patients With Renal Cell Carcinoma

Published:November 02, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2022.10.013

      Highlights

      • Data regarding direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) appear safe for venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment for patients with RCC on cabozantinib
      • No. of major bleeding events similar between no anticoagulant, low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or DOAC groups.
      • The rate of new/recurrent VTE was similar among anticoagulant groups
      • Patients with a VTE had significantly worse survival than those without a VTE

      Abstract

      Background

      In patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) on cabozantinib, venous thromboembolism (VTE) management remains challenging due to limited safety data regarding direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) use in conjunction with cabozantinib. We investigated the safety of cabozantinib with different anticoagulants in patients with RCC.

      Methods

      In this retrospective multicenter study (9 sites), patients with advanced RCC were allocated into 4 groups: (1) cabozantinib without anticoagulation, cabozantinib with concomitant use of (2) DOACs, (3) low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), or (4) warfarin. The primary safety endpoint was the proportion of major bleeding events (defined per International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis criteria). The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of new/recurrent VTE while anticoagulated.

      Results

      Between 2016 and 2020, 298 patients with RCC received cabozantinib (no anticoagulant = 178, LMWH = 41, DOAC = 64, and warfarin = 15). Most patients had clear cell histology (78.5%) and IMDC intermediate/poor disease (78.2%). Cabozantinib was first, second, or ≥ third line in 21.8%, 31.9%, 43.3% of patients, respectively. Overall, there was no difference in major bleeding events between the no anticoagulant, LMWH, and DOAC groups (P = .088). Rate of new/recurrent VTE was similar among anticoagulant groups. Patients with a VTE had a statistically significantly worse survival than without a VTE (HR 1.48 [CI 95% 1.05-2.08, P = .02]).

      Conclusion

      This real-world cohort provides first data on bleeding and thrombosis complications in patients with RCC treated with cabozantinib with or without concurrent anticoagulation. DOACs appear safe for VTE treatment for patients with RCC on cabozantinib, but optimized anticoagulation management, including individualized risk-benefit discussion, remains important in clinical practice.

      Graphical Abstract

      Keywords

      Abbreviations:

      AXL (Growth arrest-specific protein 6 receptor), CAT (Cancer-associated thrombosis), c-MET (Hepatocyte growth factor receptor), CT (Computerized tomography), DOAC (Direct oral anticoagulant), DVT (Deep venous thrombosis), IMDC (International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium), IO (Immunotherapy), ISTH (International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis), LMWH (Low molecular weight heparin), PE (Pulmonary embolism), RCC (Renal cell carcinoma), TKI (Tyrosine kinase inhibitor), VEGFR (Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor), VTE (Venous thromboembolism)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Genitourinary Cancer
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Choueiri TK
        • Escudier B
        • Powles T
        • et al.
        Cabozantinib versus everolimus in advanced renal-cell carcinoma.
        N Engl J Med. 2015; 373: 1814-1823
        • Choueiri TK
        • Hessel C
        • Halabi S
        • et al.
        Cabozantinib versus sunitinib as initial therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma of intermediate or poor risk (Alliance A031203 CABOSUN randomised trial): progression-free survival by independent review and overall survival update.
        Eur J Cancer. 2018; 94: 115-125
        • Choueiri TK
        • Powles T
        • Burotto M
        • et al.
        Nivolumab plus Cabozantinib versus Sunitinib for Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma.
        N Engl J Med. 2021; 384: 829-841
        • Yakes FM
        • Chen J
        • Tan J
        • et al.
        Cabozantinib (XL184), a novel MET and VEGFR2 inhibitor, simultaneously suppresses metastasis, angiogenesis, and tumor growth.
        Mol Cancer Ther. 2011; 10: 2298-2308
        • Lyseng-Williamson KA.
        Cabozantinib as first-line treatment in advanced renal cell carcinoma: a profile of its use.
        Drugs Ther Perspect. 2018; 34: 457-465
        • Vecchio SJD
        • Ellis RJ.
        Cabozantinib for the management of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
        J Kidney Cancer VHL. 2018; 5: 1-5
        • Pfaffenroth EC
        • Linehan WM.
        Genetic basis for kidney cancer: opportunity for disease-specific approaches to therapy.
        Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2008; 8: 779-790
        • Gibney GT
        • Aziz SA
        • Camp RL
        • et al.
        c-Met is a prognostic marker and potential therapeutic target in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
        Ann Oncol. 2013; 24: 343-349
        • Rankin EB
        • Fuh KC
        • Castellini L
        • et al.
        Direct regulation of GAS6/AXL signaling by HIF promotes renal metastasis through SRC and MET.
        Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014; 111: 13373-13378
        • Sonpavde G
        • Bellmunt J
        • Schutz F
        • Choueiri TK.
        The double edged sword of bleeding and clotting from VEGF inhibition in renal cancer patients.
        Curr Oncol Rep. 2012; 14: 295-306
        • Crist M
        • Hansen E
        • Chablani L
        • Guancial E.
        Examining the bleeding incidences associated with targeted therapies used in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
        Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2017; 120: 151-162
        • Liu B
        • Ding F
        • Zhang D
        • Wei GH.
        Risk of venous and arterial thromboembolic events associated with VEGFR-TKIs: a meta-analysis.
        Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2017; 80: 487-495
      1. Alameda CE, Inc. Cabometyx [package insert]. 2019. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2019/208692s003lbl.pdf.

        • Kahale LA
        • Hakoum MB
        • Tsolakian IG
        • et al.
        Anticoagulation for the long-term treatment of venous thromboembolism in people with cancer.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018; 6 (Cd006650)
        • Agnelli G
        • Becattini C
        • Meyer G
        • et al.
        Apixaban for the treatment of venous thromboembolism associated with cancer.
        N Engl J Med. 2020; 382: 1599-1607
        • Raskob GE
        • van Es N
        • Verhamme P
        • et al.
        Edoxaban for the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism.
        N Engl J Med. 2018; 378: 615-624
        • McBane 2nd, R
        • Wysokinski WE
        • Le-Rademacher JG
        • et al.
        Apixaban and dalteparin in active malignancy associated venous thromboembolism: the ADAM VTE trial.
        J Thromb Haemost. 2017; 117: 1952-1961
        • Young AM
        • Marshall A
        • Thirlwall J
        • et al.
        Comparison of an oral factor xa inhibitor with low molecular weight heparin in patients with cancer with venous thromboembolism: results of a randomized trial (SELECT-D).
        J Clin Oncol. 2018; 36: 2017-2023
        • Schulman S
        • Kearon C.
        Definition of major bleeding in clinical investigations of antihemostatic medicinal products in non-surgical patients.
        J Thromb Haemost. 2005; 3: 692-694
        • Abdoellakhan RA
        • Beyer-Westendorf J
        • Schulman S
        • Sarode R
        • Meijer K
        • Khorsand N.
        Method agreement analysis and interobserver reliability of the ISTH proposed definitions for effective hemostasis in management of major bleeding.
        J Thromb Haemost. 2019; 17: 499-506
        • Khorana AA
        • Francis CW
        • Culakova E
        • Kuderer NM
        • Lyman GH.
        Thromboembolism is a leading cause of death in cancer patients receiving outpatient chemotherapy.
        J Thromb Haemost. 2007; 5: 632-634
        • Khorana AA
        • Kuderer NM
        • Culakova E
        • Lyman GH
        • Francis CW.
        Development and validation of a predictive model for chemotherapy-associated thrombosis.
        Blood. 2008; 111: 4902-4907
        • Kaldany A
        • Blum KA
        • Paulucci DJ
        • et al.
        An evaluation of race, ethnicity, age, and sex-based representation in phase I to II renal cell carcinoma clinical trials in the United States.
        Urol Oncol. 2018; 36 (363.e361-363.e366)
        • Muglia VF
        • Prando A.
        Renal cell carcinoma: histological classification and correlation with imaging findings.
        Radiol Bras. 2015; 48: 166-174
        • Bianchi M
        • Sun M
        • Jeldres C
        • et al.
        Distribution of metastatic sites in renal cell carcinoma: a population-based analysis.
        Ann Oncol. 2012; 23: 973-980
        • Farge D
        • Frere C
        • Connors JM
        • et al.
        2019 international clinical practice guidelines for the treatment and prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer.
        Lancet Oncol. 2019; 20: e566-e581
        • Key NS
        • Khorana AA
        • Kuderer NM
        • et al.
        Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and treatment in patients with cancer: ASCO clinical practice guideline update.
        J Clin Oncol. 2020; 38: 496-520
        • Streiff MB
        • Holmstrom B
        • Angelini D
        • et al.
        Cancer-associated venous thromboembolic disease, version 2.2021, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology.
        J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021; 19: 1181-1201
        • Lyman GH
        • Carrier M
        • Ay C
        • et al.
        American Society of Hematology 2021 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: prevention and treatment in patients with cancer.
        Blood Adv. 2021; 5: 927-974