Advertisement
Original Study|Articles in Press

Estimated Direct Costs of Renal Cancer by Stage of Disease at Diagnosis and Phase of Its Management: A Whole-Disease Model

Published:February 08, 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2023.02.002

      Abstract

      Background

      Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the seventh most common neoplasm in high-income countries. New clinical pathways have been developed to deal with this tumor, which includes costly drugs that pose an economic threat to the sustainability of healthcare services. This study provides an estimate of the direct costs of care for patients with RCC by stage of disease (early vs. advanced) at diagnosis, and disease management phase along the pathway recommended by local and international guidelines.

      Materials and Methods

      Considering the clinical pathway for RCC adopted in the Veneto region (north-east Italy) and the latest guidelines, we developed a very detailed “whole-disease” model that covers the probabilities of all potentially necessary diagnostic and therapeutic actions involved in the management of RCC. Based on the cost of each procedure according to the Veneto Regional Authority's official reimbursement tariffs, we estimated the total and average per-patient costs by stage of disease (early or advanced) and phase of its management.

      Results

      In the first year after diagnosis, the mean expected cost of a patient with RCC is €12,991 if it is localized or locally-advanced and reaches €40,586 if it is advanced. For early disease, the main cost is incurred by surgery, whereas medical therapy (first and second line) and supportive care become increasingly important for metastatic disease.

      Conclusion

      It is crucially important to examine the direct costs of care for RCC, and to predict the burden on healthcare services of new oncological therapies and treatments, as the findings could be useful for policy-makers planning the allocation of resources.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Genitourinary Cancer
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Padala SA
        • Barsouk A
        • Thandra KC
        • et al.
        Epidemiology of renal cell carcinoma.
        World J Oncol. 2020; 11: 79-87
        • Bray F
        • Ferlay J
        • Soerjomataram I
        • Siegel RL
        • Torre LA
        • Jemal A.
        Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.
        CA Cancer J Clin. 2018; 68: 394-424
        • Buzzoni C
        • Crocetti E
        • Guzzinati S
        • Dal Maso L
        • Francisci S
        • AIRTUM Working Group
        Cancer incidence and mortality trends from 2003 to 2014 in Italy.
        Tumori. 2019; 105: 121-137
        • Rossi C
        • Sommariva A
        • Bastiaannet E
        • Velde C.
        Quality assurance and sustainability of cancer care: a European network is needed.
        Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018; 44: 383-385
        • Rotter T
        • Kinsman L
        • James E
        • et al.
        Clinical pathways: effects on professional practice, patient outcomes, length of stay and hospital costs.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010; CD006632
        • Piccinni C
        • Calabria S
        • Ronconi G
        • et al.
        Facts and figures of clinical pathways in Italy: results from the PDTA Net project.
        Recenti Prog Med. 2019; 110: 188-194
        • Martini N.
        I PDTA come indicatori del processo di cambiamento assistenziale in sanità. CARE, Rome2017: 29-31
      1. LINEE GUIDA TUMORI DEL RENE [Internet]. AIOM. 2018 Accessed February 26, 2021. Available from: https://www.aiom.it/linee-guida-aiom-2018-tumori-del-rene/

      2. Portale Sanità Regione del Veneto, PDTA Rene [Internet]. 2021 Accessed February 26, 2021. Available from: https://salute.regione.veneto.it/web/rov/pdta-rene

        • Choueiri TK
        • Hessel C
        • Halabi S
        • et al.
        Cabozantinib versus sunitinib as initial therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma of intermediate or poor risk (Alliance A031203 CABOSUN randomised trial): Progression-free survival by independent review and overall survival update.
        Eur J Cancer Oxf Engl. 1990; 94 (2018): 115-125
        • Powles T
        • Plimack ER
        • Soulières D
        • et al.
        Pembrolizumab plus axitinib versus sunitinib monotherapy as first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (KEYNOTE-426): extended follow-up from a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.
        Lancet Oncol. 2020; 21: 1563-1573
        • Christensen BR
        • Hajja YM
        • Koshkin V
        • Barata PC.
        Update on first-line combination treatment approaches in metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma.
        Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2021; 22: 15
        • Swallow E
        • Messali A
        • Ghate S
        • McDonald E
        • Duchesneau E
        • Perez JR.
        The additional costs per month of progression-free survival and overall survival: an economic model comparing everolimus with cabozantinib, nivolumab, and axitinib for second-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
        J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018; 24: 335-343
        • Rn H
        • Md H
        • Sp N
        • et al.
        Health care costs among renal cancer patients using pazopanib and sunitinib.
        J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015; 21 (44a): 37-44
        • MacLean E
        • Mardekian J
        • Cisar LA
        • Hoang CJ
        • Harnett J.
        Real-world treatment patterns and costs for patients with renal cell carcinoma initiating treatment with sunitinib and pazopanib.
        J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016; 22: 979-990
        • Pruis S-L
        • Aziz MIA
        • Pearce F
        • Tan MH
        • Wu DB-C
        • Ng K.
        Cost-effectiveness analysis of sunitinib versus interferon-alfa for first-line treatment of advanced and/or metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Singapore.
        Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2019; 35: 126-133
        • Amdahl J
        • Diaz J
        • Sharma A
        • Park J
        • Chandiwana D
        • Delea TE.
        Cost-effectiveness of pazopanib versus sunitinib for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the United Kingdom.
        PLOS ONE. 2017; 12e0175920
        • Meng J
        • Lister J
        • Vataire A-L
        • Casciano R
        • Dinet J.
        Cost-effectiveness comparison of cabozantinib with everolimus, axitinib, and nivolumab in the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma following the failure of prior therapy in England.
        Clin Outcomes Res CEOR. 2018; 10: 243-250
        • Kaye DR
        • Min HS
        • Herrel LA
        • Dupree JM
        • Ellimoottil C
        • Miller DC.
        Costs of cancer care across the disease continuum.
        The Oncologist. 2018; 23: 798-805
        • Hollenbeak CS
        • Nikkel LE
        • Schaefer EW
        • Alemao E
        • Ghahramani N
        • Raman JD.
        Determinants of medicare all-cause costs among elderly patients with renal cell carcinoma.
        J Manag Care Pharm. 2011; 17: 610-620
        • Maroun R
        • Fleury L
        • Nachbaur G
        • Maunoury F
        • Vanhille J-L
        • Durand-Zaleski I
        Real-world costs and outcomes in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with targeted therapies: a cohort study from the French health insurance database.
        Curr Med Res Opin. 2017; 33: 1755-1762
        • Motzer RJ
        • Jonasch E
        • Agarwal N
        • et al.
        Kidney Cancer, Version 2.2017, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology.
        J Natl Compr Cancer Netw JNCCN. 2017; 15: 804-834
        • Briggs A
        • Sculpher M
        • Claxton K
        Decision Modelling for Health Economic Evaluation.
        Int J Epidemiol. 2007; 36: 476-477
        • Kim SH
        • Park B
        • Hwang EC
        • et al.
        Retrospective multicenter long-term follow-up analysis of prognostic risk factors for recurrence-free, metastasis-free, cancer-specific, and overall survival after curative nephrectomy in non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
        Front Oncol [Internet]. 2019; 9 (Accessed February 26, 2021Available from:)
        • Escudier B
        • Porta C
        • Schmidinger M
        • et al.
        Renal cell carcinoma: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.
        Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol. 2016; 27: v58-v68
      3. The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications–(Eds.)–1975 [Internet]. Harold A. Linstone and Murray Turoff; 1975 Accessed February 26, 2021. Available from: https://web.njit.edu/∼turoff/pubs/delphibook/index.html.

      4. Regione del Veneto. Tariffario DRG Regione del Veneto [Internet]. Available from: https://salute.regione.veneto.it/c/document_library/get_file?p_l_id=1026082&folderId=1026048&name=DLFE-32750.pdf

      5. Regione del Veneto. Nomenclatore tariffario delle prestazioni di assistenza specialistica ambulatoriale. [Internet]. Available from: https://www.regione.veneto.it/web/sanita/assistenza-ambulatoriale

        • Guest JF
        • Ruiz FJ
        • Greener MJ
        • Trotman IF.
        Palliative care treatment patterns and associated costs of healthcare resource use for specific advanced cancer patients in the UK.
        Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2006; 15 (Mar): 65-73
        • Purmonen T
        • Nuttunen P
        • Vuorinen R
        • Pyrhönen S
        • Kataja V
        • Kellokumpu-Lehtinen P.
        Current and predicted cost of metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Finland.
        Acta Oncol Stockh Swed. 2010; 49: 837-843
        • Buja A
        • Rivera M
        • De Polo A
        • et al.
        Real-world data for direct stage-specific costs of melanoma healthcare.
        Br J Dermatol. 2020; 183: 171-172
      6. Buja A, Pasello G, De Luca G. Non-small cell lung cancer: real-world cost consequence analysis. JCO Oncol Pract. In press.

        • Maroun R
        • Maunoury F
        • Benjamin L
        • Nachbaur G
        • Durand-Zaleski I.
        In-hospital economic burden of metastatic renal cell carcinoma in france in the era of targeted therapies: analysis of the French National Hospital Database from 2008 to 2013.
        PloS One. 2016; 11e0162864
        • Mitchell AP
        • Harrison MR
        • Walker MS
        • George DJ
        • Abernethy AP
        • Hirsch BR.
        Clinical trial participants with metastatic renal cell carcinoma differ from patients treated in real-world practice.
        J Oncol Pract. 2015; 11: 491-497
        • Motzer RJ
        • Hutson TE
        • Cella D
        • et al.
        Pazopanib versus sunitinib in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma.
        N Engl J Med. 2013; 369: 722-731