Advertisement
Original Study|Articles in Press

Differential Prognostic Value of Extrarenal Involvement in Patients With Non-Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer

  • Giacomo Musso
    Affiliations
    Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
    Search for articles by this author
  • Giuseppe Fallara
    Affiliations
    Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
    Search for articles by this author
  • Giuseppe Rosiello
    Affiliations
    Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
    Search for articles by this author
  • Alberto Martini
    Affiliations
    Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
    Search for articles by this author
  • Chiara Re
    Affiliations
    Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
    Search for articles by this author
  • Francesco Cei
    Affiliations
    Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
    Search for articles by this author
  • Giuseppe Basile
    Affiliations
    Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
    Search for articles by this author
  • Daniele Cignoli
    Affiliations
    Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
    Search for articles by this author
  • Gianmarco Colandrea
    Affiliations
    Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
    Search for articles by this author
  • Isaline Rowe
    Affiliations
    Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
    Search for articles by this author
  • Alessandro Larcher
    Affiliations
    Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
    Search for articles by this author
  • Andrea Salonia
    Affiliations
    Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
    Search for articles by this author
  • Francesco Montorsi
    Affiliations
    Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
    Search for articles by this author
  • Umberto Capitanio
    Correspondence
    Address for correspondence: Umberto Capitanio, Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy, Phone: +39 02 2643 7286.
    Affiliations
    Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
    Search for articles by this author
Published:February 24, 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2023.02.008

      Highlights

      • pT3a stage in non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma encloses various invasion patterns, but their oncological outcomes remain unclear.
      • We demonstrated that having more than 2 invasion patterns is associated with worse survival outcomes.
      • As a consequence, the concurrent presence of ≥ 2 invasion patterns might imply potential role for either adjuvant therapy or a more stringent follow-up.

      Abstract

      Introduction

      A better definition of the prognostic significance of non-metastatic pT3a stage RCC subcategories is crucial to select the best candidate for adjuvant treatment. The aim of the study is to investigate the differential prognosis of extrarenal involvement in patients with non-metastatic pT3a RCC.

      Materialsand methods

      From a single institutional prospective database, 451 consecutive patients treated for pT3aN0/NxM0 RCC were selected and stratified according to pT3a subtypes (perirenal fat invasion, sinus fat invasion, segmental/renal vein thrombus, ≥ 2 features). Cancer specific survival (CSS), metastasis free survival (MFS) and relapse free survival (RFS) were primary endpoints of multivariable Cox regression models.

      Results

      Overall, 67 (15%) patients presented with renal/segmental vein thrombus only, 185 (41%) with perirenal fat invasion, 101 (22%) with sinus fat invasion and 98 (22%) with ≥ 2 features. The presence of ≥ 2 pT3a features was associated with a higher risk of metastasis (HR=2.36; 95%CI 1.30–4.27; P value = .005), recurrence (HR=2.41; 95%CI 1.36-4.28; P value=.003) and cancer specific mortality (HR=3.54; 95%CI 1.45–8.63; P value = .005) compared to only 1 pT3a feature. Moreover, the presence of perirenal fat invasion was associated with lower CSS (HR=2.82; 95% CI 1.19–6.69; P value = .02) compared to sinus fat invasion or tumoral thrombus only.

      Conclusion

      The concurrent presence of ≥ 2 pT3a features is associated to a higher risk of distant progression, relapse and cancer specific mortality, implying potential role for adjuvant therapy or a more stringent follow-up. Moreover, perirenal fat invasion is associated with worse CSS compared to other pT3a patterns taken alone.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Genitourinary Cancer
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Capitanio U
        • Montorsi F
        Renal cancer.
        Lancet. 2016; 387: 894-906https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00046-X
        • Ljungberg B
        • Albiges L
        • Abu-Ghanem Y
        • et al.
        European Association of Urology guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: the 2022 update.
        Eur Urol. 2022; 82https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2022.03.006
        • Choueiri TK
        • Tomczak P
        • Park SH
        • et al.
        Adjuvant Pembrolizumab after Nephrectomy in renal-cell carcinoma.
        N Engl J Med. 2021; 385: 683-694https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2106391
        • Bedke J
        • Albiges L
        • Capitanio U
        • et al.
        Updated European Association of urology guidelines on the use of adjuvant pembrolizumab for renal cell carcinoma.
        Eur Urol. 2021; 81 (2022): 134-137https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2021.11.022
      1. FDA approves pembrolizumab for adjuvant treatment of melanoma.
        Case Med Res. 2019; : 22-23https://doi.org/10.31525/fda1-ucm631565.htm
        • Martini A
        • Fallara G
        • Pellegrino F
        • et al.
        Neoadjuvant and adjuvant immunotherapy in renal cell carcinoma.
        World J Urol. 2021; 39: 1369-1376https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03550-z
        • Fallara G
        • Bandini M
        • Larcher A
        • et al.
        High-risk Surgically Resected Renal Cell Carcinoma: is there a role for adjuvant VEGF-TKI inhibitors?.
        Curr Probl Cancer. 2021; 45100759https://doi.org/10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2021.100759
        • Amin MB
        • Greene FL
        • Edge SB
        • et al.
        The eighth edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more “personalized” approach to cancer staging.
        CA Cancer J Clin. 2017; 67: 93-99https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21388
        • Zhu D
        • Cao J
        • Zhi C
        • et al.
        Prognostic significance of the sub-classification of stage pT3a renal tumors by perinephric and sinus fat invasion.
        Oncol Lett. 2020; https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2020.11281
        • Zhang Z
        • Yu C
        • Velet L
        • Li Y
        • Jiang L
        • Zhou F
        The difference in prognosis between renal sinus fat and perinephric fat invasion for pT3a renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis.
        PLoS One. 2016; 11e0149420https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149420
        • Wang Z
        • Yu K
        • Zhu Y
        • et al.
        Multiple patterns of perirenal fat invasion are associated with a poorer prognosis compared with isolated invasion: a proposal for a Revision of T3aN0M0 TNM staging system.
        Front Oncol. 2020; 10: 336https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00336
        • Charlson ME
        • Pompei P
        • Ales KL
        • MacKenzie CR
        A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.
        J Chronic Dis. 1987; 40: 373-383https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8
        • Oken MM
        • Creech RH
        • Tormey DC
        • et al.
        Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.
        Am J Clin Oncol. 1982; 5: 649-655
        • Bedke J
        • Buse S
        • Pritsch M
        • et al.
        Perinephric and renal sinus fat infiltration in pT3a renal cell carcinoma: Possible prognostic differences.
        BJU Int. 2009; 103: 1349-1354https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08236.x
        • Bertini R
        • Roscigno M
        • Freschi M
        • et al.
        Renal sinus fat invasion in pT3a clear cell renal cell carcinoma affects outcomes of patients without nodal involvement or distant metastases.
        J Urol. 2009; 181: 2027-2032https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.01.048
        • Park M
        • Shim M
        • Kim M
        • Song C
        • Kim CS
        • Ahn H
        Prognostic heterogeneity in T3aN0M0 renal cell carcinoma according to the site of invasion.
        Urol Oncol Semin Orig Investig. 2017; 35: e17-458.e22https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.05.019
        • Brookman-May SD
        • May M
        • Wolff I
        • et al.
        Evaluation of the prognostic significance of perirenal fat invasion and tumor size in patients with pT1-pT3a localized renal cell carcinoma in a comprehensive multicenter study of the CORONA project. Can we improve prognostic discrimination for patients with stage pT3a tumors?.
        Eur Urol. 2015; 67: 943-951https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.055
        • Shah PH
        • Lyon TD
        • Lohse CM
        • et al.
        Prognostic evaluation of perinephric fat, renal sinus fat, and renal vein invasion for patients with pathological stage T3a clear-cell renal cell carcinoma.
        BJU Int. 2019; 123: 270-276https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14523
        • Stühler V
        • Rausch S
        • Kroll K
        • Scharpf M
        • Stenzl A
        • Bedke J
        The prognostic value of fat invasion and tumor expansion in the hilar veins in pT3a renal cell carcinoma.
        World J Urol. 2021; 39: 3367-3376https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03638-0
        • Campi R
        • Stewart GD
        • Staehler M
        • et al.
        Novel liquid biomarkers and innovative imaging for kidney cancer diagnosis: what can be implemented in our practice today? a systematic review of the literature.
        Eur Urol Oncol. 2021; 4: 22-41https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2020.12.011
        • Rosiello G
        • Larcher A
        • Fallara G
        • et al.
        Head-to-head comparison of all the prognostic models recommended by the European Association of Urology Guidelines to predict oncologic outcomes in patients with renal cell carcinoma.
        Urol Oncol Semin Orig Investig. 2022; 40: 271.e19-271.e27https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.12.010
        • Cianflone F
        • Lazarevic D
        • Palmisano A
        • et al.
        Radiomic and gEnomic approaches for the enhanced DIagnosis of clear cell REnal Cancer (REDIRECt): a translational pilot methodological study.
        Transl Androl Urol. 2022; 11: 149-158https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-21-713