Advertisement
Original Study|Articles in Press

PSEUDOPROGRESSION AND MIXED RESPONSES IN METASTATIC RENAL CELL CARCINOMA PATIENTS TREATED WITH NIVOLUMAB: A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS

Published:March 09, 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2023.03.003

      ABSTRACT

      Introduction

      Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are part of the current standard of care for metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (m-ccRCC). ICI can elicit diverse tumor response, including atypical responses such as pseudoprogression (psPD), mixed responses (MR) and late responses. We aimed to analyze the occurrence and prognostic impact of atypical responses in m-ccRCC patients treated with nivolumab.

      Materials and methods

      A retrospective analysis of m-ccRCC patients treated with nivolumab in first or subsequent therapy line between November 2012 and July 2022 was performed. All radiographic evaluations of eligible patients were analyzed using the iRECIST consensus guideline.

      Results

      We assessed 247 baseline target lesions in 94 eligible patients. MR occurred in 11 (11.7%) patients: in 7 at first CT evaluation (CT1) and in 4 at second CT evaluation (CT2). In 8 patients (73%), MR evolved to confirmed PD. In 3 patients (27%), MR evolved towards a partial response (PR) and was thus a psPD. psPD occurred in 8 (8.5%) patients: with psPD features at CT1 in 3 patients, with psPD features at CT2 in 2 patients, and with MR features at CT1 in 3 patients. psPD patients had similar progression-free survival and overall survival compared to patients displaying PR as best response without a phase of psPD. 76 patients were treated beyond immune unconfirmed progressive disease (iUPD) at any moment: 12 (16%) of them evolved towards PR or stable disease (SD). Treatment beyond immune confirmed PD (iCPD) in 20 patients did not lead to PR or SD.

      Conclusions

      Atypical responses such as psPD and MR occurred in 8.5% and 11.7% of m-ccRCC patients treated with nivolumab at CT1 and CT2. Patients with psPD had favorable outcomes, while MR most often evolved to progression. Treatment with nivolumab beyond iCPD did not lead to tumor stabilization or regression.

      MICROABSTRACT

      Outcome of renal cell carcinoma has significantly improved with immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, patients show atypical response such as mixed response and pseudoprogression. We retrospectively analyzed 94 renal cell carcinoma patients and found 8.5% of pseudo-progressors with similar outcome to responders. Our study adds to the limited evidence in this area, helping clinicians treat their patients with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Genitourinary Cancer
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      BIBLIOGRAPHY

        • Sung H
        • Ferlay J
        • Siegel RL
        • et al.
        Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.
        CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2021; 71: 209-249https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660
        • Demasure S
        • Spriet I
        • Debruyne PR
        • et al.
        Overall survival improvement in patients with metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma between 2000 and 2020: a retrospective cohort study.
        Acta Oncologica. 2022; 61: 22-29https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186x.2021.1989720
        • Motzer RJ
        • Escudier B
        • McDermott DF
        • et al.
        Nivolumab versus Everolimus in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma.
        New England Journal of Medicine. 2015; 373: 1803-1813https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1510665
        • Choueiri TK
        • Powles T
        • Burotto M
        • et al.
        Nivolumab plus Cabozantinib versus Sunitinib for Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma.
        New England Journal of Medicine. 2021; 384: 829-841https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2026982
        • Motzer R
        • Alekseev B
        • Rha S-Y
        • et al.
        Lenvatinib plus Pembrolizumab or Everolimus for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.
        New England Journal of Medicine. 2021; 384: 1289-1300https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2035716
        • Motzer RJ
        • Tannir NM
        • McDermott DF
        • et al.
        Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab versus Sunitinib in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma.
        New England Journal of Medicine. 2018; 378: 1277-1290https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1712126
        • Rini BI
        • Plimack ER
        • Stus V
        • et al.
        Pembrolizumab plus Axitinib versus Sunitinib for Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma.
        New England Journal of Medicine. 2019; 380: 1116-1127https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1816714
        • Rathmell WK
        • Rumble RB
        • Van Veldhuizen PJ
        • et al.
        Management of Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: ASCO Guideline.
        Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2022; 40: 2957-2995https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.22.00868
        • de Velasco G
        • Krajewski KM
        • Albiges L
        • et al.
        Radiologic Heterogeneity in Responses to Anti–PD-1/PD-L1 Therapy in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
        Cancer Immunology Research. 2016; 4: 12-17https://doi.org/10.1158/2326-6066.Cir-15-0197
        • Queirolo P
        • Spagnolo F.
        Atypical responses in patients with advanced melanoma, lung cancer, renal-cell carcinoma and other solid tumors treated with anti-PD-1 drugs: A systematic review.
        Cancer Treatment Reviews. 2017; 59: 71-78https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2017.07.002
        • Chiou VL
        • Burotto M.
        Pseudoprogression and Immune-Related Response in Solid Tumors.
        Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2015; 33: 3541-3543https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2015.61.6870
        • Seymour L
        • Bogaerts J
        • Perrone A
        • et al.
        iRECIST: guidelines for response criteria for use in trials testing immunotherapeutics.
        The Lancet Oncology. 2017; 18: e143-e152https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30074-8
        • Tazdait M
        • Mezquita L
        • Lahmar J
        • et al.
        Patterns of responses in metastatic NSCLC during PD-1 or PDL-1 inhibitor therapy: Comparison of RECIST 1.1, irRECIST and iRECIST criteria.
        Eur J Cancer. 2018; 88: 38-47https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2017.10.017
        • Wolchok JD
        • Hoos A
        • O'Day S
        • et al.
        Guidelines for the evaluation of immune therapy activity in solid tumors: immune-related response criteria.
        Clin Cancer Res. 2009; 15: 7412-7420https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.Ccr-09-1624
        • Heng DYC
        • Xie W
        • Regan MM
        • et al.
        Prognostic Factors for Overall Survival in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated With Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor–Targeted Agents: Results From a Large.
        Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2009; 27: 5794-5799https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2008.21.4809
        • Escudier B
        • Motzer RJ
        • Sharma P
        • et al.
        Treatment Beyond Progression in Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated with Nivolumab in CheckMate 025.
        Eur Urol. 2017; 72: 368-376https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.03.037
        • Hans S
        • Simonaggio A
        • Hamidatou K
        • et al.
        Nivolumab (N) treatment beyond progression in a real-world cohort of patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).
        Annals of Oncology. 2019; 30: v388-v389https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdz249.056
        • Yilmaz M.
        Atypical response patterns in metastatic melanoma and renal cell carcinoma patients treated with nivolumab: A single center experience.
        Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice. 2021; 27: 1106-1111https://doi.org/10.1177/1078155220949642
        • Pires Da Silva I
        • Lo S
        • Quek C
        • et al.
        Site-specific response patterns, pseudoprogression, and acquired resistance in patients with melanoma treated with ipilimumab combined with anti–PD-1 therapy.
        Cancer. 2020; 126: 86-97https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.32522
        • Fujimoto D
        • Yoshioka H
        • Kataoka Y
        • et al.
        Pseudoprogression in Previously Treated Patients with Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Who Received Nivolumab Monotherapy.
        Journal of Thoracic Oncology. 2019; 14: 468-474https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2018.10.167
        • Parseghian CM
        • Patnana M
        • Bhosale P
        • et al.
        Evaluating for Pseudoprogression in Colorectal and Pancreatic Tumors Treated With Immunotherapy.
        Journal of Immunotherapy. 2018; 41: 284-291https://doi.org/10.1097/cji.0000000000000222
        • Cohen R
        • Bennouna J
        • Meurisse A
        • et al.
        RECIST and iRECIST criteria for the evaluation of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient metastatic colorectal cancer: the GERCOR NIPICOL phase II study.
        Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer. 2020; 8e001499https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2020-001499
        • Lee DH
        • Hwang S
        • Koh YH
        • et al.
        Outcome of Initial Progression During Nivolumab Treatment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Should We Use iRECIST?.
        Front Med (Lausanne). 2021; 8771887https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.771887
        • Bohnsack O
        • Hoos A
        • Ludajic K.
        1070P - Adaptation of the Immune Related Response Criteria: Irrecist.
        Annals of Oncology. 2014; 25: iv369https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdu342.23
        • Ma Y
        • Wang Q
        • Dong Q
        • Zhan L
        • Zhang J.
        How to differentiate pseudoprogression from true progression in cancer patients treated with immunotherapy.
        Am J Cancer Res. 2019; 9: 1546-1553
        • Champiat S
        • Ferrara R
        • Massard C
        • et al.
        Hyperprogressive disease: recognizing a novel pattern to improve patient management.
        Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology. 2018; 15: 748-762https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-018-0111-2
        • Kim JY
        • Lee KH
        • Kang J
        • et al.
        Hyperprogressive Disease during Anti-PD-1 (PDCD1) /PD-L1 (CD274) Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
        Cancers. 2019; 11: 1699https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11111699